inbreeding diversity genetics breeding dogs pedigrees breed standards genes coefficient paternal maternal zygot population prepotency
Now that we have added a second row to form a column, a comment is in order that will greatly reduce your labor. Look ahead to the completed Table 3 e, for a moment. If you draw a diagonal line down the matrix from the cell Edmund-Edmund to the cell X-X, the numbers above that line will be the same as the numbers below that line. The diagonal is darkly shaded in the completed table in Table 3 e (step 4 of this Bob-Victoria breeding exercise). The shaded upper-right “triangle” in the completed table can be flipped around the diagonal axis to fill in the lower part of the table. The row for Edmund contains exactly the same entries as the column for Edmund. So to get started, we copy the entry from Edmund-Emma into Emma-Edmund, which is ‘0’. The rest of the entries follow as in step (1):
| Emma – Tom = 0; | Emma – X = 0/2 + 3/8; | Emma – Bob = 0/2 + 0/2 = 0; |
| Emma – Annie = 0; | Emma – Vin = 0/2 + ½; |
Emma – Jack = 0/2 = 0; Emma – Vic = ½ + ¼
Since Emma is “related to herself” (“has the same genes” is another way of saying this) by a factor of one, look across her row and see who else she is related to. To Vincent, it is 1 (herself as one of the parents) divided by 2 (since she is only one of the two parents.) In the same way, relationship to Victoria is calculated by dividing 1.5 (½ for Vincent’s R value and 1 for her own as Victoria’s dam) by 2, to give the ¾ you see in the table. Emma has no relation to Bob because she has no relation to his parents Jack or Annie (therefore 0/2 in each case).
And now, back to where we were, in the early stages of constructing that coefficient of inbreeding Table 3:
|
Edm. |
Emma |
Tom |
Annie |
Tom |
Edm / Em |
Jack / An |
Vin / EmVictoria |
Bob /Vic |
|
Edmund |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1/2 |
0 |
1/4 |
1/8 |
Emma |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1/2 |
0 |
3/4 |
3/8 |
We continue to build our table. Remember that for convenience more than anything else, we put the oldest ones on the left, and X, the Bob-Victoria pup, on the right: Rows ‘Tom’ through ‘Victoria’
The next six rows were filled in as outlined in steps (1) and (2) above. Note that the values in the triangle below the diagonal are the same as in the upper triangle, flipped around the diagonal. When we look at Victoria’s pedigree, though, we see something that requires special attention. We said earlier that we can use the tabular method to find inbreeding coefficients, and Victoria is inbred (on Emma).
|
Edm |
Emma |
Tom |
Annie |
Tom Jack |
Ed Em |
Jack An |
Vinc Em |
Bob Vic |
|
Edm |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¼ |
1/8 |
Emma |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¾ |
3/8 |
Tom |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¼ |
0 |
1/8 |
Annie |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¼ |
Jack |
0 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¼ |
Vinc |
½ |
½ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
¾ |
3/8 |
Bob |
0 |
0 |
¼ |
½ |
½ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
½ |
Vict |
¼ |
¾ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
¾ |
0 |
1 + ¼ |
5/8 |
In the entry Victoria-Victoria, we see that the entry is 1 + ¼. Where did the ¼ come from and what does it mean? The 1 is Victoria’s relationship to herself in the absence of inbreeding. When an animal is inbred, or if you are not sure if an animal is inbred, you determine the coefficient of inbreeding from the table entry that corresponds to the relationship between its two parents. Victoria’s parents, Vincent and Emma, have a coefficient of relationship of ½. If we divide by 2, we get the ¼ in the table entry. Victoria is the most linebreed/inbred dog in this chart.
We can write the formula out more formally as: FAnyDog = ½ (RSire-Dam). To show that this works the way we assert it does, we’ll also find Bob’s coefficient of inbreeding: FBob = ½ (RVincent-Emma), and ½ of (0) is 0. Examination of Bob’s pedigree confirms that his coefficient of inbreeding is 0.
We are then left with only one row left to fill in, that belonging to X. If we fill out this last row as we have filled out all of the others, we will see that X is not inbred, despite the fact that his dam was. The fact that this is so may not come as much of a surprise because it is clear from the pedigree that Bob’s line is unrelated to Victoria’s.
|
Edm |
Emma |
Tom |
Annie |
Tom |
Ed Em |
Jack An |
Vin Em |
Bob Vic |
|
Edmund |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¼ |
1/8 |
Emma |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¾ |
3/8 |
Tom |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¼ |
0 |
1/8 |
Annie |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¼ |
Jack |
0 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¼ |
Vin |
½ |
½ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
¾ |
3/8 |
Bob |
0 |
0 |
¼ |
½ |
½ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
½ |
Vic |
¼ |
¾ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
¾ |
0 |
1 + ¼ |
5/8 |
X |
1/8 |
3/8 |
1/8 |
¼ |
¼ |
3/8 |
½ |
5/8 |
1 |
We will now present a pair of brief examples to demonstrate two important ideas. The first point is that a table like the one above can be easily extended to answer “What-if…?” type questions about future matings. The second is that two inbred parents can produce offspring that are not inbred as long as the parents do not share a common ancestor. We will use the pedigree presented in Figure 4 for this example.
dog’s name (“Y”) here |
Sire: Bill |
Sire: Jack |
Sire: Tom |
Dam: n.a. |
|||
Dam: Lisa |
Sire: Tom |
||
Dam: n.a. |
|||
Dam: Victoria |
Sire: Vincent |
Sire: Edmund |
|
Dam: Emma |
|||
Dam: Emma |
Sire: n.a. |
||
Dam: n.a. |
The sire of Y, Bill, is the product of a half-sib mating, while the dam, Victoria, is the product of a dam-son mating. The completed table of relationships and inbreeding coefficients is:
|
Edm |
Em |
Tom |
Tom |
Tom |
Ed Em |
Jack Lisa |
Vin Em |
Bill Vic |
|
Edmund |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¼ |
1/8 |
Emma |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¾ |
3/8 |
Tom |
0 |
0 |
1 |
½ |
½ |
0 |
½ |
0 |
¼ |
Lisa |
0 |
0 |
½ |
1 |
¼ |
0 |
5/8 |
0 |
5/16 |
Jack |
0 |
0 |
½ |
¼ |
1 |
0 |
5/8 |
0 |
5/16 |
Vincent |
½ |
½ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
¾ |
3/8 |
Bill |
0 |
0 |
½ |
5/8 |
5/8 |
0 |
1 + 1/8 |
0 |
9/16 |
Victoria |
¼ |
¾ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
¾ |
0 |
1 + ¼ |
5/8 |
Y |
1/8 |
3/8 |
¼ |
5/16 |
5/16 |
3/8 |
9/16 |
5/8 |
1 |
Both parents of Y are inbred (FBill = 1/8 and FVictoria = ¼), but as they do not share a common ancestor, FY = 0. This example emphasizes a point made earlier: inbreeding is dependent on relationship. In small breeds, it often happens that there are a few very influential individuals to whom most of the population is related. These elevated levels of relationship can make it difficult to plan matings free of inbreeding.
Let us say, for the sake of argument, that we are thinking about mating Emma to Y because we are using her in a linebreeding program. The goal of linebreeding, usually connoting a “milder” form of inbreeding, is to maintain a high degree of relationship and similarity to a desirable individual, and is usually carried out by mating that individual recurrently. The pedigree in Figure 5 outlines a possible linebreeding scheme based on the repeated use of Emma as a dam. The paternal side of the pedigree is the same as shown in Figure 4.
Fred Lanting is an internationally respected show judge, approved by many registries as an all-breed judge, has judged numerous countries’ Sieger Shows and Landesgruppen events, and has many years experience with SV. He presents seminars and consults worldwide on such topics as Gait-&-Structure, HD and Other Orthopedic Disorders, Anatomy, Training Techniques, and The GSD. He conducts annual non-profit sightseeing tours of Europe, centered on the Sieger Show (biggest breed show in the world) and BSP.
All Things Canine -- consulting division, Willow Wood Services Phone: 256-498-3319 Fax: 256-498-3311 E-mail mr.gsd@netscape.com
Canine HD and Other Orthopedic Disorders by Fred Lanting.
It covers all joints plus many bone disorders and includes
genetics, diagnostic methods, treatment options, and the role that environment
plays. This new "Hip Dysplasia and Other
Canine Orthopedic Disorders" book is a comprehensive (nearly 600
pages!), amply illustrated, annotated, monumental work that is suitable as a
coffee-table book, reference work for breeders and vets, and a study adjunct for
veterinary students, for the dog trainer
and the general dog owner of any breed.
The Total German Shepherd Dog by Fred Lanting
This is the expanded and enlarged second edition, a "must" for
every true GSD lover. It is an excellent alternative to the "genetic history" by
Willis, but less technical and therefore suitable for the novice, yet very
detailed to be indispensable for the reputable GSD breeder. Chapters include:
History and Origins, Modern Bloodlines, The Standard, Anatomy, The German
Shepherd in Motion, Shows, Showing, and Training, The Winners, Nutrition and
Feeding, General Care and Information, Health and First Aid, Parasites and
Immunity, Diseases and Disorders, The Geriatric German Shepherd, Breeding,
Basics of Genetics, Reproduction, Whelping, The First Three Weeks, Four to
Twelve Weeks, Trouble-shooting Guide.Click here to purchase
books by Fred Lanting
If you enjoyed this article, please consider placing a link on your web page. Just copy the code below and paste it into the html on your page. |